Face-to-Face Teaching Resumes in Barbados Next Week

BRIDGETOWN, Barbados – Trade unions representing teachers here have welcomed the decision by the Barbados government for a phased return to face-to-face classes starting on February 21 as the island continues to recover from the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

schObarA phased return to face-to-face classes in Barbados starts on February 21st. (photo courtesy of Barbados Today)Education Minister Kay McConney told a press conference Tuesday that schools will resume physical classes on a phased basis including flexible accommodation for certain teachers.

The Education Minister said that discussions had taken place with all the stakeholders to reach the point where a phased return to school could be achieved and that during discussions with all the unions, “there were a number of concerns that were raised, and the ministry has at every turn sought to respond”.

“There was the question as it relates to random testing and we have assured them, through the Ministry of Health and Wellness, that we will ensure that there is random testing once the resources are available,” McConney said, adding that the unions had also expressed concerns about the provision of masks for their members.

“The ministry has committed, along with our…international partners who have assisted in providing masks in the past, who have agreed that they will continue to work with us so that we can ensure that all schools are provided with extra masks.

“So, the ministry has committed that we will make masks available at all schools for those persons who need them; and where, through our own investment or through the contributions of our partners, we are able to secure additional masks we will make sure that they are made available to the teachers and the students and the staff to the extent that we can do so.”

Chief Education Officer Dr Ramona Archer-Bradshaw said that the Ministry of Education has done all that it can do up to this point to ensure that the plant is safe.

“However, we have come to understand, through discussion with the unions, that there are some members who are not quite comfortable with the return to school on the 21st.

““Because we have an understanding of this pandemic and the morbid sensitivities that persons may have on returning to school, we have allowed for flexibility with regard to the return of some classes, or maybe some cohorts, on the 21st February, 2022,” she said, adding that this would not hinder those who are ready to return on that date.

The Chief Education Officer said those skeptical about resuming face-to-face instruction next week for safety reasons, would be given a one-week hiatus to “settle themselves to return at a later date”.

President of the Barbados Union of Teachers (BUT) Rudy Lovell has expressed reservations about having some teachers start in-person teaching on February 21 and others the following week.

“Essentially, one can say being delayed with the option being given to some teachers who are not comfortable to return. But on the other hand, you cannot have teachers given an option to return when they feel comfortable and still expect the schools to function efficiently,” said Lovell, who has called for a two-week delay to the start of classes.

He told the online Barbados TODAY publication that he has nonetheless given the assurance that BUT members will turn up for duty and hope for the best.

“The Barbados Union of Teachers is hoping for a safe return to face-to-face classes and we will monitor the situation as things progress,” he said, adding “we would not want a situation where schools would have to close for any given reason.

“We are hoping for the best and that our members and our students can feel comfortable in the surroundings that they will be occupying.”

President of the Barbados Secondary Teachers’ Union (BSTU), Mary Redman, has welcomed the phased return to the physical classroom and the flexible arrangements for its members.

“The BSTU is satisfied with the provisions for the phased return to face-to-face instruction and the flexibility allowed for the timing of the return to school by its members and the phased nature of the return of students.

“This agreement between the two entities came about after hours of vigorous negotiations between the BSTU and ministry officials. The BSTU reconsidered the two-week delay based on the provisions put in place by the ministry, which the union had recommended,” Redman said, acknowledging that the Ministry of Education was willing to accommodate the call for attention to be given to the mental health of teachers.

“There was concession and accommodation on both sides that augurs well for the building of goodwill and trust necessary to overcome the novel and profound challenges facing us in these times of COVID.”